Symbolic Debate in AI versus Connectionist - Competing or Complementar Essay

Symbolic Debate in AI versus Connectionist - Competing or Complementary - Essay ExampleIf the generate of human-oriented Artificial Intelligence is to develop common sense, an extreme example of the purely symbolic approach is to be seen in the Cyc project. Here, common-sense rules inferred from the everyday world are hard-coded into the clay such that it will be able to handle any type of situation. And it is in this extremely symbolic approach that the worst failures of that approach will credibly be seen forget one fact, and the system crashes, with nothing to lean back on.On the other hand, best-suited to the connectionist approach are models of the brain at the micro-level. The brain is, after all, a neural networkliterally. The problem here is that we get a working model, but with a very little description of what is actually going on inside, and the question begs to be asked (by connectionists, of course) why model it if it cannot be explained?The natural thought is that the re must be some way the two systems can co-operate. press an interesting problem, one that may seem far-fetched but which is good enough to serve as an example that of nonsense translation, as in English French German Suite, quoted in Gdel, Escher, Bach An Eternal Golden Braid (Douglas Hofstadter, 1979, page 366). Here, a translation into German by Robert Scott of Lewis Carrolls Jabberwocky is presented. The English stanzaTwas brillig, and the slithy toves tout ensemble mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths out trip upe.Gets translated into the German asEs Brillig war. Die schlichten TovenUnd aller-mmsige BurggovenDie Mhmen Rth ausgraben.Consider outgrabe how would one translate it into German? It turns out that out is aus in German, and grab sounds perfectly German add to that the common German -en suffix and one gets ausgraben. Similar principles apply to the translation of all the nonsense words here.